Archive for the ‘European Commission’ Category

Busy months ahead for EU climate policy

October 17, 2007

Well, the past few months have been extremely busy for EU climate change policy. Unfortunately we weren’t able to update this blog very often, so I will now have to try to quickly summarise what’s been going on and what is expected. We’re hoping to keep the blog more up to date, and to provide some analysis of what is going on, in the coming months.

The EU Commission is currently working on mammoth package of new energy and emission legislation proposals this autumn. The package was announced in January (see our earlier post) and given the go ahead by heads of state at the Spring Summit in March.

Among the measures under discussion:
– a strategic energy technology plan and rules on carbon capture and storage expected for November
-new rules and targets for renewables expected for December
-a review of emissions trading
-new measures on energy efficiency

After these new measures are presented in the autumn, they will be discussed by member states and the EU parliament during the course of 2008.

One of most contentious issues will be how the renewable energy target will be split among all countries. While EU heads of state signed off in March a 20% renewable energy target, they did not specify how this would translate into national targets. The Commission will make its initial proposals on this in December. The debate among member states in the Council is however likely to be pretty heated, particularly because it has meanwhile emerged that some member states are actively lobbying one way or the other.

The UK government has been particularly active. Despite its often stated intention to “take the lead” on climate change, some forces in the government appear to be actively trying to undermine renewable energy. In particular, a leaked memo written for ministers by the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) made for some shocking reading.

The paper reveals that these forces in the UK government believe the country will not achieve its own, existing targets for renewable energy. The solution? Not, as one would expect given the climate crisis, to boost renewable energy policy. After all, the UK has a huge amount of wind and a large potential for wave power and few effective policies in place to promote them.

No, the solution, according to the BERR – is to lobby the EU to make sure the block’s target for 2020 is weakened. It is surprising that the UK government has taken this approach when the UK has some of the best renewables resources in Europe. In many ways, the proposals BERR makes are also in complete contradiction to the reccomendations contained in the UK governmnent’s own Stern review.

Also, BERR has now successfully pushed the EU Commission to link the ongoing review of the EU emissions trading system and the new discussions on the renewables target burden sharing – which were previously separate.

The results of the review and a new Directive on renewables are therefore now expected to be presented at the same time in December. Now, this may seem to an outsider as a good idea. Of course all climate policies should be coordinated and seen as part of one package. However, the agenda behind this is that some forces – e.g. within BERR – appear to think that we can achieve climate change goals without having to bother setting targets for renewable energy. The market, i.e. emissions trading, will achieve that. If only! Of course, that would be a “theoretically neat” solution (their words).

Problem: the emissions trading market needs considerable strengthening if it is to work. I personally believe it can, and will be strengthened. But to believe that this will be enough to stimulate the development of renewable energy is rather bizarre. In fact, the EU emissions trading was never set up with that goal in mind, but rather to merely promote a more modest goal to switch to cleaner fossil fuels.

Also, undermining the current framework for renewable energy (which does include targets and has been successful in many countries such as Germany) could be very disruptive. Regulatory uncertainty could put off the large number of investors that are currently queuing up to put money in renewable resources around Europe.

More to follow!

EU energy proposals emerge but disappoint many

January 15, 2007

As anticipated last week, the European Commission has launched its blueprint for a “new industrial revolution” based on a set of new energy and climate policy proposals. Most of what we anticipated was correct. The only major proposal that had appeared in the most recent draft documents but later disappeared was the proposal to set a border tax on products coming from countries that did not regulate greenhouse gas emissions, such as the US.

The EU Commission called for Europe to set a unilateral target to cut greenhouse gas emissions 20% by 2020, rising to 30% if other industrialised countries will do the same. The decision to set a unilateral target has undoubtedly sent shock-waves across the world. However, environmentalists complained the target is very low compared to what needs to be done to ensure the world stays below a 2 degree increase above pre-industrial temperatures. The Commission itself recognises in accompanying documents that it will be cost-effective and feasible for the EU to make the reductions necessary to stay within this limit, which scientists say is the key threshold to avoid the worst consequences of climate change.

New legislation will likely emerge on renewables (to achieve a 20% share of renewable energy by 2020 and a 10% target for biofuels) and carbon capture and storage, including the possibility of installing carbon capture and storage in several fossil fuel power stations by 2015 and phasing out plants without it. Environmentalists were unhappy about the lack of other sectoral targets, and a complete lack of any new measures for the heating and cooling sector.

The mention of nuclear power as a key technology received lots of media coverage. However, in reality the EU does not have the power to regulate the fuel mix of member states (and most of them plan to phase out nuclear or have never had it). The package will however lead to new EU rules on nuclear safety and security, which some believe may boost investment on nuclear (which has stalled for decades).

The progress report on renewable energy, a key document that was issued with the energy package, appeared to have not been given enough coverage in many countries (although there was major coverage on all newspapers in Italy, as this sunny country turned out to be at the bottom of the league table on renewables, with this technology declining rather than growing…). I will try to write more about this in the coming days.

The EU Commission is also going to do more work with China to tackle rising greenhouse gas emissions there, Reuters reported.

Welcome to Europe, Planet Earth

January 9, 2007

A new year and a new blog – but what makes this blog different?

Like many blogs, this has a focus – Europe (particularly the European Union) and its environmental policy.

The European Union (EU) is now made up of 27 countries, with a population of just under 500 million people (see ‘What is the EU‘ on this site for more details). The EU is rich by global standards, and includes the countries that started the industrial revolution.

In the last few decades, the EU has become one of the leading environmental regulators in the world, agreeing regulations to control factory pollution, chemicals in toys and protection of biodiversity, to name just a few.

The world is facing massive environmental challenges, not least climate change/global warming. What can the EU – and its environmental policies – do to help move us towards a sustainable future? The EU has the power to do a huge amount – but does it have the political will?

We are not trying to substitute for news services such as ENDS Europe Daily (which we highly recommend). Instead we plan to offer up a more personal selection of what is happening in what is (probably) the world’s most active environmental regulator.

To find out more about us & this blog, see about this blog.